Sour Grapes… or not?

Hey, if the rest of the country is complaining, why can’t I?

So here we go:
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=bayless/060205.

And for good measure:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs05/columns/story?columnist=smith_michael&id=2320683.

Excerpt from second article:

Here’s what referee Bill Leavy’s crew did, point blank: It robbed Seattle. The Seahawks could have played better, sure. They could have done more to overcome the poor officiating. We understand that those things happen and all, but even with all the points Seattle left on the field, there’s a good chance the Seahawks would have scored more than the Steelers if the officials had let the players play.

This is the most unjust loss in Superbowl history.

One Response to Sour Grapes… or not?

  1. i’m not one who watches much football, but i was exploding over sunday’s game. seattle was playing some solid ball, but they got the title snatched out of their hands with the help of a bundle of bad, bad calls. the steelers really didn’t play so well, and although they pulled off a couple neat tricks, there was no way in a fair game that they could beat the seahawks as it stood. sorry guys; if i were a steeler i’d feel that i don’t deserve that trophy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>